Black Holes and Dimensions

Einstein's equations, when it comes to black holes and other very dense objects, are incorrect. That's because his dimensional geometry is incorrect. The Lorentz factor and gravitational equations must be corrected according to the model I am currently developing. My math is working with the experiments, I just have to finalize my equation describing gravity. The equation only comes into play after a certain angle of space-time folding. Which is why Einstein's equations work with light objects. Because his equations work, but only up to a very precise point of curvature. This could take a few hours, to a few months.

You probably heard of length contraction. It's effects when the cause is gravity, are in respect to 3D mathematics. Now I introduce width contraction in a spherically curved space-time. The math for that are in 2D.

What Is The Wheel?

Gravity And Philosophy

Most physicists simply assume that space-time is curved around an object without putting that into question. Einstein is almost never put into doubt. Something is missing in the mind of a physicist. Knowledge from other fields. Those who are experts in relativity know practically nothing about quantum mechanics and vice versa.

What if the true underlying of gravity rested in the reconciliation of both fields? What if gravity is the child of particle probability wave interference?

Relativity by itself has yet to figure out why matter appears to curve space and time. Maybe it's time to look elsewhere for an answer.

Not All Movement Requires Energy

Something You Will Not Understand

If you list ALL the possible numbers between 0 and 1, you can still create numbers that will not be on that list. Which makes counting to infinity not only impossible in the sense that it would take for ever, but that a computer would miss an infinite amount of numbers even if it counted all the numbers.

Democracy

Even if handled properly, democracy will never be the solution to any civilization and/or species because of biological evolution.

People tend to blame capitalism for the global problems. I say democracy. And the fact that people blame capitalism is to me all the necessary evidence to support my blaming of democracy. People blame capitalism because they are stupid. This stupidity is projected by the power of the people through democracy making for poor economic management because idiots detain power.

Basically, I'm saying that democracy is a proven failure by the fact that people are stupid enough to blame capitalism. Capitalism is a failure because of democracy, which exists because people are stupid enough to believe their voices and opinions are legitimate enough for every individual to detain power, yet most people disagree in political debates. Rare are the cases where two people will end in agreement. So you disagree with almost everyone else, you are closer to being right than most people. Yet democracy is ok? How can you disagree with most and still believe democracy is the right way? You blame capitalism because you don't see the problem with democracy because you are insufficiently intelligent and/or wise to see the problem with democracy. Capitalism is a brilliant concept. Instead of exchanging objects which have subjective value relative to one's needs, someone came up with the idea to create something with universal value. Genius, seriously.

Democracy, on the other hand, is what has created one of the worse case scenarios possible for the otherwise idealistic capitalist system. Because idiots, the most populous category of humans, detain power.

If you consider everything I just said as a big mathematical equation, the result is the following: Capitalism is responsible for global problems because people believe capitalism is responsible for global problems.

So stop blaming capitalism. Because the problem behind capitalism is us, the people and our worthless opinions.

The Two Dimensional Universe

Our universe is composed of 2 spatial dimensions, and one temporal, that projects itself as a spatial dimension. Information in the universe is contained within 2 spatial dimension, meaning that our mathematics apply to 2 dimensions and not 3. The third dimension is the direction in which you are moving relative to space-time, and your speed determines your temporal angle. For an object to move along a 2D plane, such as the universe, it must travel through time. Also, Momentum (P=rmv) is philosophically wrong. It should be P=mvr. (Where r is Gamma) since the mass does not increase, contrarily to what seems to confuse physicists, it's the velocity that is multiplied by Gamma. The velocity that must be used in P=mvr is the velocity of the traveler, and not a still observer. This occurs due to time dilation.

Our universe is in 2 dimensions, we can travel faster than light, and mass is unchanged, simply that the relative Kinetic energy of a traveling object is high for no apparent reason to an observer, and not that the mass increases.

The Uncertainty Principle

∆x∆p≥h/2 (Uncertainty Principle) is not about uncertainty, it's about approaching the instantly unobservable probability wave state of particles.

Believing in God makes him unlikely to exist.

As odd as it might seem, and for reasons I will spare for the public because of the extremely dangerous background reflection that lead to the following conclusion, believing in God reduces the odds for him to exist. Therefore religious people and observers reduce the odds for them to be right. I won't say why, mankind is not ready. I might be wrong, but this opinion is a public menace. Just reflect on the implications of believing in a God for a bit.

Why Did The Universe Come Into Existence? (And why the last post about this is incomplete)

How did the universe come into existence?

SEE PREVIOUS POST: WHY INFINITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A VALUE.

Well, basically, it came into existence because the odds of that happening were not 0%. Since the existence of time in the verse ours was born is unknown, we can define the odds of the universe coming into existence by the following: ∞ (100-x) where "x" are the odds of the universe occurring. Therefore: x= ∞ (100-x) Send ∞ to the other side: x/∞= 100-x.

To solve this, you must consider that not all infinities are equal. Example: A circle with a diameter of ∞ has a circumference of ∞ as well, but the circumference still is π times longer since diameter x π = circumference. No matter the value of "x" you get 0.00[...]001 on the left side of the equation.

Now send the x on the other side. 0.00[...]001+x=100.

So the odds of the universe happening are of 99.9999999% These odds occur every infinith of an instant.

If 99.9% is the value of X, we must start all over again with that in mind.

99.9= ∞ (100-99.9)

99.9= ∞ ( 0.0[...]01 )

99.9=1=100 or, the multiple of 10 that is closest to 99.9, in this case, 100.

The odds for the universe to exist are not even 99.9%, rather 100%.

100% multiplied by ∞.

The existence of the universe is in no way impressive to me.

Give feedback!

Why infinity should be considered as a value.

Why infinity should be considered as a value and not just a concept.

Some mathematicians argue that infinity cannot be used in formulas and equations because it is not a set value. I disagree. Why? Because infinity can vary.

If I take between 1 and 2, there are an infinite amount of decimals. Now add to between 1 and 2 what is between 2 and 3. You have the infinite values of between 1 and 2 plus the infinite values of between 2 and 3. So your infinity after the addition is 2x larger than the initial infinity. Other example is if you have a circle with a diameter of ∞, the circumference is π times larger. If infinity can vary, it's value can vary.

So when I say: x= ∞(100-x), you must consider that the infinity here is a multiple of 10. Because the relative value of infinity must be in agreement with the rest. And if not, then yes ∞ has no place in a formula, but if it is implied that it is the appropriate relative value, then you can do correct algebra with ∞ used as a value. All that represents a quantity and can vary represents a value.

In my book: (1/∞)∞=1

Check out my Youtube channel! https://www.youtube.com/user/humanstupidty

Why did the universe come into existence?

How did the universe come into existence?

Well, basically, it came into existence because the odds of that happening were not 0%. Since the existence of time in the verse ours was born is unknown, we can define the odds of the universe coming into existence by the following: ∞ (100-x) where "x" are the odds of the universe occurring. Therefore: x= ∞ (100-x) Send ∞ to the other side: x/∞= 100-x.

To solve this, you must consider that not all infinities are equal. Example: A circle with a diameter of ∞ has a circumference of ∞ as well, but the circumference still is π times longer since diameter x π = circumference. No matter the value of "x" you get 0.00[...]001 on the left side of the equation. Now send the x on the other side. 0.00[...]001+x=100.

So the odds of the universe happening are of 99.9999999% These odds occur every infinith of an instant. If preferred, the odds for the universe to exist can be accurately seen as;

∞(∞-1)

The existence of the universe is in no way impressive to me.

Why The Arrow Paradox Is Complete Nonsense.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Aub69TAork&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Philanthropy

We all make a difference. It's up to us to choose what that difference will be.

Universal Philosophy

To all those who might be interested;

I have important theories that answer popular and unpopular questions. Some theories answer quantum mechanics observation problems that still to date, are not understood, to how perception impacts the observed and non observed universe relative to yourself, others and a possible ultimate perception.
I also talk about light, the speed of time, the expansion of the universe, and hyperdimensions.

Please post, ask questions, state your beliefs.